You can read right? So when you saw me accuse you of spreading lies what did you think it meant? Did you know that I meant that you were accusing a man of first degree murder even though by definition it's not what you were saying?
Are you going to continue to argue like a woman? The passive aggressive bullshit? The gaslighting? All while you act like my reaction is unwarranted?
It's an interesting tactic that's for sure.
Again with the antagonism. We can have a civil debate. No need for insults. If you saw my previous comment, i mentioned that it was my mistake to designate it as first-degree and that it is still murder.
I really don't give a shit what you think at this point. You're not a trustworthy person and you debate in bad faith. Why would I ever meet that neutrally? Why would I be coming from a position of neutrality toward someone who is positioning themselves as some authority on the subject but then when met with a clear and obvious discrepancy in their views doubles down and acts like a victim when it's called out.
You don't know what you're talking about. You're spreading lies and when challenged you cry victim.
I don't have any interest in being civil with a person like you.
