The transaction is tracked the same, do you call that an anon transaction? I don't
Discussion
I do call it an anon transaction. How would you deanon me or link me to amy other payment?
But is not because you have non kyc that the transaction is untrackble, you will see the same on blockchain, i think you are a little bit confused here, we are talking about different things, to make bitcoin move untrackble you need to mint it on DarkFI, and then you can transact dBTC in a untrackble way
You think if i make a payment like this on bitcoin im gonna have trouble with the government? Thats the only think i would care about as to anonymity. Ik there are technical differences in how much info im leaking but realistically does the average person need more anonymity that what i discribed ?
Of course you can have, because what you said don't grant you 100% anonimity, but what i explained to you that you can do with darkFI yes, and thats a big difference..
It's not that easy to grant 100% and that doesnt even exists..
The thing is using what have the best odds, why be in the middle?
My reason is i think bitcoin is the shelling point for crypto. Thats why we have the 4 year cycles and ngu.
bitcoin is worthless in the conditions we are talking
doesnt worth nothing i mean
Yeah idk i think if crypto and exchanges where banned bitcoin would be find because there would be no kyc info.
It would be useless the same, why people would choose to use an option that have bigger risks than other options available?
Because of the shelling point. Do you recognize the importance of that?
I cant think of any way you could be deanonomized
Me no, maybe a state can, maybe not, it depends on conditions that you dont control