I like Jack’s follow up comment which is basically “I like strong stands even if they’re wrong” lol

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I have a few artists friends who share the same sentiment that ai art is stealing. I weirdly don’t have the same feeling with generated code 🤔. I guess code is only stealing if its an exact copy.

All forks start as a copy

The thing is though, AI art is imitation with zero meaning or experience behind it. If you look at it from the perspective of art is just aesthetic then no difference. But if you look at anything for the depth of what it’s representing then you have a difference there, because all AI art would only otherwise bring the same context of human capacity to create AI, not the complex differences of human experience.

ie there’s not the depth of real meaning or experiences to the AI art, not unless AI becomes so ‘sentient’ and can ‘feel’. But I think everyone can have their opinions of course, that’s what makes us not AI (no offence AI don’t matrix me pls) 😊

once we have embodied robots with autonomous ai.. things will get interesting

Sex robots?

Uhhhh…is that already happening?? 😅😅

Yes, did you want Whitney Cummings Sex Robot special?

uhh i think I prefer the real thing on this one 😆

Yep I agree there, gonna be freeeky AF 😅😅😅

But I think it would become more normal…and we’ll have like cyborg people part machine and clones…but basically that will all be created by us and our ultimate biological brain computers, I think it would be hard to compete with millions of years of evolution but we’ll see

I think it's more like the underdog that doesn't have a chance. I admire they are trying anyways.

People line up around the corner for new technology, people are going to create with it and it's already implemented into systems.

It's inevitable at this point.

Just a thought.