because they dont reject the monero because they can differentiate between moneroj
they refuse it because they CANT differentiate
ie, they refuse it because it is fungibile and cant do chainanalysis on it
because they dont reject the monero because they can differentiate between moneroj
they refuse it because they CANT differentiate
ie, they refuse it because it is fungibile and cant do chainanalysis on it
They can do analysis on monero. With enough resources you can do analysis on anything. Sure the analysis is easier on Bitcoin but they can still do it.
Are there any utxos that have been blocked by miners and prevented from spending?
that's not an argument for bitcoins fungibility. its just "well maybe with enough examination a monero tx isn't fungible either"
which is true and is why monero still iterates to improve the protocol.
beyond Mara mining OFAC-compliant blocks for a sec I'm not aware of any specific mining level censorship. why?
Mara and plenty of other miners can and will choose to censor certain utxos. My question is, have any utxos been effectively rendered worthless because ALL miners or most of the hash rate has banned it?
I dunno man.
its got nothing to do with the conversation.
fungibility and censorship resistance are related topics,
but theyre not the same thing.
and if mining censorship doesn't exist that doesn't prove fungibility.
CEXs and their puppet masters don't want you to have private and fungible (i.e. the true definition of) ecash.