Mass-migration is a topic that triggers

Given I was born in the UK, but now live in Australia, I am a migrant

I met and married an Australian citizen

Indeed I am now a citizen of Australia

So it would be fair to say that I am a advocate for migration

But what’s interesting is the volume ie “mass” part of this current trend, policy, debate

Plus the way it’s sold to the public, it’s a “good” thing, the “right” thing

But was it voted for?

Look at the sheer volume of migrants

Australia, UK, being my 2 major places of interest, but throughout Europe you see it

It’s hardly a surprise it’s so disruptive

Is it by design? If so, who and why?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think, in retrospect, this will be one of the most debated questions of the modern age.

I too am a migrant. I have many close friends who are migrants & descendants of migrants.

But we all agree what we are seeing in the west in the last 5-10 years is wholly unnatural and manufactured. Purposeful. With intent and planned.

To what end is the real question...

Balance GDP?

Offset plummeting birthrates?

Create societal tension and conflict?

My mother is a migrant and I'm a migrant. I oppose mass immigration. There is a difference when a huge group of people move to take advantage of the fruit of the labor of others: they don't contribute, they don't assimilate and they try to impose their own customs and rules.

Probably all to do with fiat fuckery. Bring in bulk quantities of migrants who will work for minimum wages in aged care, cleaning, etc. Keeps wage inflation low to give more runway for the money printing. Maybe 🤔

Am a fourth generation New Zealander from my fathers side. I am Indian. What’s happening is wrong. Got into an uber the other day. Driver was Sikh. Spoke to me in a language I did not understand. I responded with silence. He tried again twice in his language. Got to my destination and left the vehicle without saying a word

Sounds like you’re in London lol