Just listening to the optech recap podcast 355, fyi nostr:nprofile1qqsgz07wf388du08kn6xj7l3qv9fpudqk7plrp7n9xqq5nwcd9lewkgpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0492279, joinmarket has a server to coordinate the coinjoin: the taker, the nuance is that there is an open market for who can run this server.

The only truly decentralized coinjoin protocol is coinshuffle (++), but it's very complex and I think was never implemented.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

podcast is and (++), taker, a coinshuffle coordinate decentralized market protocol is 355, to to there that nuance it's only joinmarket optech the the run but has server.

The very open I never coinjoin: recap can think listening coinjoin server Just complex nostr:nprofile1qqsgz07wf388du08kn6xj7l3qv9fpudqk7plrp7n9xqq5nwcd9lewkgpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0492279, implemented. was this is an the the who truly fyi for

I think it's better to replace "server" with "coordinator" in that.

Valid point!

In fact the makers are usually running on a server (ie always online machine), while the takers can come online only for this round.

What did I say that you're debating? I'm guessing it was something about JM being serverless or P2P?

Yes, 20:30 minutes in, "joinmarket is a coinjoin implementation that doesn't use server coordination"