I think many are incorrectly labeled as Putin simps when what they are actually doing is just trying to push back on the narrative that the West and left are a shining pillar of integrity and honesty. They may not necessarily think he's a good person, and don't go as far as saying that, however they might agree with some of the things he says and support that as a form of supporting free speech, when the rest of the world is trying to cancel him and anyone that appears to support him.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

would you be able to support the free speech of a man who says your country doesn't exist, that you don't have your language and you should be part of his country?

If your country was full of nazis and war criminals yes.

Its ok it will all be over this year. The comedian zelensky is doing a great job caring for his people 🤣

Lol, there is more nazis in an average european football match. Not to mention russian matches.

Supporting free speech means people should be allowed to say anything.

it's quite clear that he wanted the minsk agreements to happen, in which even the donbass remained as ukrainian.

having nukes on anyone's borders aimed at you is a no go for anyone

I'm pretty sure if Russia suggest their nukes could go to Cuba the yanks would go ballistic

I absolutely agree with you

I don't know enough about him personally or politically so I reserve judgement

however, to me it is clear that him and the Russians have a functioning diplomatic core which the West has utterly lost

he looks good in comparison to the western simps

but in a world of functional diplomats, he'd look worse than he does