Germany just got a "Selbstbestimmungsgesetz", that is, they legalized the possibility to declare your own sex. I find it very interesting to realize that this kind of cutting off of words (in this case words like man, woman, daughter, son) from physical reality, which is common for all gender theories, finds its equivalent in money theory:

Jörg Guido Hülsmann writes in his very worthwhile book: "The Ethics of Money Production" (translation from the German version I'm reading):

"For example, the government might adopt the view that the phrase 'an ounce of gold' is merely a string of letters that could be given virtually any treaty-binding meaning. It would follow that a mint would be entitled to issue coins bearing the words 'one ounce of gold' which in reality contain only half an ounce or no gold at all." p130-131

The key concept here is the cutting off of the relationship between what is being said and the physical reality that is meant by said word. The link to physical reality is broken.

That is why fiat money are 'broken money', as Lyn Alden puts it. There is no connection to the realm of emperical physics.

And on the contrary, that is why gold is real money, and #bitcoin as well. The usage of energy to mine bitcoin blocks establishes this essential relationship to physical reality. And even aftet the mining reward ceases to be, it still needs a lot electricity to receive the mining fees thus still binding the bicoin protocol to the use of real physical energy to continue its existence.