Nostr Web Client

Oh it was good faith when your buddy was lying about what first degree murder was for the sake of exaggerating his position? That was good faith? I started the bad faith. Hmmmmm should we rewind the tape? Or should we leave it where it is so you both can feel morally superior for some odd reason?

Now you're crying victim.

The Beave 5d ago

I'm not a victim. I'm am a nearly professional pot-stirrer. 😁

Sure. He exaggerated. Who doesn't from time to time? You've latched on to that pretty hard. But you can't claim that about me since I've been pretty consistent that I don't think this was premeditated based on what is currently known.

I'm not morally superior. I'm simply being, IMO, consistent. I'm not even attaching any morality to a majority of my statements since that's a mess to discuss and a morass to argue.

He is my buddy, but we disagree often. But, we're still friends, or at least pretty decent faceless internet acquaintances. You pointed out his degree inconsistency. He accepted that, if you'll care to remember.

So what's your beef?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

makeheroism 5d ago

Ok so his exaggerations are excusable and mine are some egregious assault on the art of debate as a whole? The contradictions are insane.

I've latched onto that because it's clearly contradictory in the nature of both of your arguments.

You're not being consistent.

And the misogynist shit proves it. I said it to another guy that you're lambasting over his take on the entire situation. You're both just doing halo effect bullshit because it's a woman that got shot and it's plain as day.

I really don't care about any of this at all. I just want the hundred million people that are in my country that shouldn't be out. If some retarded dyke is going to park her car in the way of that and then drive toward someone trying to get them out then I mean my advice is probably going to be shoot her.

This shit has gone on long enough. I don't care that it's a woman. I don't care that she has kids.

And I certainly don't care about you guys playing white knight about some woman that would exchange your life for some cotton candy.

The Beave 5d ago

Yes.

Because I know him and I don't know you so I am able to overlook that based on prior history and see that he is still, IMO, mostly correct.

I don't know you. I will certainly give the benefit of the doubt to those I know before those I don't.

And you are just off into ad hominem land when you had started off with a perfectly cogent debate. it devolved into arguing and now it is personal attacks. Bro, stop. They will not work on me. I have been a keyboard warrior for far too long to be goaded or upset by that. I probably have a lower opinion of myself than you have of me. Just stahp!

How is it contradictory?

I am being so consistent it isn't even funny. Just because my foundation of my arguments is not one you would like to accept, and that multiple horrible things can be true at one time is a fact of life doesn't mean that I am inconsistent.

You calling someone a misogynist is comical. That is a perfect example of an ad hominem. I like to point that out as it is funny to me. I am certainly mocking your use of that tactic, as it should be mocked.

Hey! We agree. I am all for physical removal, so to speak. (HHH reference FTW!)

Here is another thing that sucks, but is also true: The retarded dyke has every right to protest government action she sees as incorrect. That is her right to free speech, assembly, and of association at action. She played the game badly and lost. The leftists are going to make her a sainted martyr. The right is going to make the agent a sainted hero. That story has already been crafted and disseminated. You are still missing the further point: Who set this up? For what purpose? Without asking that, you are never going to understand what is going on now and what will happen next.

I am also not white knighting her. She's a horrible woman. Period. I honestly can't stand leftist women the most. They are ugly, twisted creatures who can't even see basic facts through years of delusion being blown up by years of circle fartsniffing other leftist delusion.

But guess what? She was still human. She still had rights. You are human. I am human. We still have rights. And if I cannot stand up for a fellow human's rights, then I am not being consistent with my own beliefs. Just because you hate someone doesn't mean you are allowed to strip them of their humanity to be able to justify murder or worse. (There is always worse . . . )

You saying that kind of thing shows that you have no consistent belief, just that you want to be rid of whatever you hate. I reject that mode of being. It is awful and leads to the worst kinds of attrocities, the kind that are happening all over the world right now. It is sad to see someone decently intelligent and articulate so sucked into to political "sides" when that is the worst way in which to view the world. IMO.

makeheroism 5d ago

"I'm consistent"

Goes on to explain in detail how and why you're biased

Ok. Don't care about the rest of the stuff you said.

The Beave 5d ago

My view on this situation is consistent.

My view on my friends in consistent.

My view on you has changed.

If you can't parse bias, you are not fit to have anything worth sharing with others. Everyone is biased. We are human. Bias/judgement is how we function. Applying it correctly is hard. Maybe you don't understand that.

makeheroism 5d ago

Did you mean the wrestler?

The Beave 5d ago

I really don't understand what you typed.