Here's your summary from Jonathan Turley: This was the 'haymaker' in SCOTUS arguments on Trump immunity case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLLi42Hpkio) on the Fox News channel:
**TLDR:** The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding presidential immunity, with Chief Justice Roberts questioning the extremes of both sides and Justices grappling with the distinction between public and private acts.
- Chief Justice Roberts openly mocked the D.C. Circuit's standard for presidential prosecution.
- Justices seemed uncomfortable with both the sweeping arguments of the Trump team and the D.C. Circuit's decision.
- The Trump team argued for absolute immunity, while the Department of Justice argued for zero immunity.
- Justices considered whether challenging an election result is a public or private act.
- The quality and richness of arguments at the Supreme Court level were noted.
In a complex and nuanced discussion at the Supreme Court, the issue of presidential immunity was dissected with Chief Justice Roberts questioning the extremes presented by both sides. The distinction between public and private acts, as well as the implications for presidential functioning, were central to the debate. The nuances of the arguments and the justices' discomfort with sweeping positions highlighted the complexity of the issue at hand.
The Supreme Court session provided a deep dive into the intricacies of presidential immunity, with Chief Justice Roberts leading the charge in questioning the validity of the arguments presented. The balance between protecting the presidency and ensuring accountability was at the forefront of the discussion, showcasing the complexities of legal interpretation at the highest level.
#news #foxnews #conservatives #republicans #trump #fjb