That’s a false assumption, because complexity accelerates entropy. Look it up, I am not imagining it 🐶🐾🫡
Discussion
i said specifically that the greater the structure (size and order) the lower the frequency of its occurrance, and what you speak of is the effect of this pattern
god bless nassim taleb but he is correct when he says that the greater the amount of order in a system the higher the cost of maintaining it, or conversely, the bigger the system, the easier it is to destroy it
the bitcoin blockchain is an example of a complex system that has elements that maintain and accumulate order, and of course, its energy budget must increase in proportion with the amount of structured data it maintains
Dispensing energy is exactly what entropy is. And you always get less than you input. Always. 🐶🐾🫡
entropy is information that is hard to predict emerging from an exchange
sometimes it really can be caled "negentropy" because very occasionally shuffling a system causes order to increase
this pattern is what taleb calls "antifragile"
only materialists who disregard the presence of information and its influence on physics don't get this
it's central to understanding what the very notion of "economic growth" actually means, not the stupid NGU of fiat but the actual reduction of inefficiencies
negentropy is the general category of all things that have value and what mckenna was calling "novelty"
Pseudoscience IMHO, but yet again. There is no point of us arguing when neither of us are open to a change 🐶🐾🫡🫂
if you understood how AI proximity hash recognition systems worked you would get what i'm talking about
shuffling a system does not always lower it's structure, or there would be no order even at the nano scale
structure that builds engines of gathering structure together has a way of gradually gathering systems that conserve structure and eventually find ways to increase it
this in no way invalidates the point that energy is lost in this process