Thats why I'm asking why you think he cant claim to be satoshi 😅 in case I'm wrong
Discussion
So I read the full ruling and posted my analysis of it on here piece by piece. I think it was about 30 -50 separate posts written in length over 1 or 2 days after the ruling was published.
From memory, I didn't get any indication that the ruling allows for Craig to claim he is Satoshi under any circumstances.
However, I'm not prepared to go through my notes or even try to find the posted thread here to see if I made a mistake.
I'm not sure anybody else did this kind of deep dive into the ruling and so unless I am shown any first hand evidence that contradicts this, I am not going to change my opinion on this.
Because I don't have the time or inclination to revisit the analysis, I am in no position to argue my side and so I do not wish to contradict your view.
I do, however respect it.
I'm interested as this is not what I understood, will read through your notes and see what I missed. Although not tonight, its been a long day and I haven't eaten enough. Appreciate your zap earlier 🤗
I found one of my note IDs through a search engine if you want to vist my analysis.
nostr:note1wzs5sz96tajztv4m7tp8w03umxskxcck4va6mcky3nqa54msf2gs3rrttg
Also this:
But I'm not sure how to view the previous or next post once you find one 😂
nostr:note1f82y2azvcswlkscky28w2k354u77hswdh8f27p205d8vrq343deq0wh7g2
This is the search engine I found:
I wish I'd known about habla.news back then 😂
Brill thanks!