Nope. Damus was not targeted.

It’s always about the money. If you’ve learned anything at all it’s to always follow the money.

Apple doesn’t give two shits about Damus or Nostr.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But isn’t that the point? The money?

Since Damus has a big user base, there was a big volume of note zaps so a lot of money transacted. Apple is hungry and wanted their cut. Therefore targeting Damus

I think Apple saw a popular app promoted by nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m that allowed users to zap each other without going through in-app purchases and didn’t bother to look any further. What amount of money could nostr:npub1earna05hx6ax38r33h3atmecjzdu547m8suw87w70aw6mlyga4hsqcja5j have possibly offered to get special treatment? I don’t think it works like that.

They pay per zap. A cut of the exchanged zaps. That’s pretty easy to understand I hope.

May want to read their terms of service. I just did.

😱

Like I said, you’ve been warned.

An app that has VC behind it will always receive special treatment from big tech. 🤡

But nostr:npub1earna05hx6ax38r33h3atmecjzdu547m8suw87w70aw6mlyga4hsqcja5j is our friend I thought? This VC must be different from the rest😄

The next bull run is going to be scam central. It’s already starting.

AND AWAY WE GO.

Different VC 🤣👌

Definitely. My small brain can compute that.

All that opaque stuff with the nsec is not very encouraging either

Clear a mud.

i think each app can get reviewed by a different employee that understands and follows app store guidelines and policies differently and there's probably not much more to it than that. probably try to get your app reviewed on the weekends vs weekdays

Ridiculous take.

Amazing Apple got to trillions in valuation with such a rogue, reckless policy.

Use your heads folks.

I thought this was a home of Bitcoiners.