Owns a public company. He has to toe the fiat line.
But they’re referring to his recent appearance on nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak ‘s podcast where they disagreed about yield
Owns a public company. He has to toe the fiat line.
But they’re referring to his recent appearance on nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak ‘s podcast where they disagreed about yield
Frankly, I thought each were being a little obtuse towards the others' position. Bitcoin could be exchanged for shares of equity (in a startup, for example). Bitcoin could be loaned out at a given rate of interest (to a startup, for example). Each strategy may be used to improve the original holder's overall financial situation; but they each come with their own set of risks. Both can be true. I don't really see the controversy.
Yeah I agree it’s kind of silly. They’re both rigid in their ideologies. Probably to their own disadvantage