I don't think he did. Even if it were compromised, someone would notice it and have it reversed in a jiffy.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Plenty of open source is compromised. Being open source isn't a panacea. Yes, it CAN be reversed, but which ten lines in 100,000,000 lines of code introduces a vulnerability?

Ok, go use your closed source phone with known unpatched vulnerabilities then. I'll stick with open source software that maybe has bugs that haven't been found.

I didn't miss the point. I just think your point is kinda dumb and shortsighted.

It's a logical fallacy Brunswick ended up using, of which I think is the Unreasonable Inclusion fallacy.

Try at least being certain about which logical fallacy.

I think your post is kinda dumb