Hal, Adam & Satoshi are the only ones I can think of that played a part in engineering BTC.
BTC was almost perfect, if not perfect, at inception.
That’s the point I was making about Adams quote from his time trying to make it “better”.
MSTR & Nostr are no different in the overall scheme of things.
Underlying BTC remains unchanged and is better for that. IMO
I get all that and I agree -- I lean conservative as far as BTC "development" goes. I don't even think we need Lightning (unless it is as a means to enable anonymous transactions, as it seems to do with Cashu) because I don't think we need to add any "features" to what Bitcoin does very well -- store of value and unalterable timechain.
I do think though that there's a big difference between developing ON Bitcoin and just using BTC the asset.
