I think you’re 💯 pct correct that there’s something fascinating going on there, and I think it’s largely undiscovered territory from an academic perspective.

So how could personalized grapevine WoT relays possibly relate to the brain? The challenge that faces us today is to build freedom tech that solves real problems for real people. The reason this is a hard problem is that freedom tech means that in theory, there should be no centralized authority to create and maintain the digital tools and languages that enable our apps to talk to one another. So in theory, our starting point is a digital Tower of Babel, so to speak. Big guess what: as human beings in the analog world, we face exactly the same problem! With no central authority to create and maintain spoken languages, how do linguistic conventions even come into being? How do we arrive at decentralized linguistic consensus? I speculate that the design of the brain is influenced strongly by the need to solve this exact problem. And the solution is twofold: first, organize information (in the brain) into some variation of the idea of a graph database or knowledge graph; second, employ a handful of very simple, very basic web of trust algorithms for consensus formation. This is how a decentralized population of sovereign individuals agree to call a hat a “hat.” And once the necessary digital tools are built, we’re gonna find ourselves using similar strategies of decentralized consensus formation to agree to use “created_at” instead of “createdAt” for kind 1 notes.

🍇🧠⚡️