Gotcha, thanks for the response 👍

I am still formulating my opinion on the scarcity of Monero. I agree with your assessment of the tail emissions.

My issue with the supply, and potential future of Monero as money on the global stage is that it is no where near decentralized enough to withstand the types of attacks that Bitcoin has survived. Bitcoin has been under attack essentially constantly for almost 10 years and no one can change it. I am skeptical that Monero could survive in its current form with that kind of pressure.

It's hard forks have had consensus, but again it hasn't had to survive a malicious or contentious hard or soft fork attempt.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I wasn't around for them, but apparently there was at least one rather contentious hard fork. Back when random X was introduced that stopped ASIC miners from being able to mine it, and the original, I guess, was called "Monero V" or something. Obviously, most of the community did not want that because they want digital cash and believe that anybody should be able to get their hands on it. And ASIC devices would prevent that. Also, the Monero community believes that ASIC devices are extremely centralizing because only a couple of manufacturers make them. They only have one purpose and they can be easily tracked from imports and stuff. Like, if I buy an ASIC, there's only one thing I'm going to be doing with it, and that's mining crypto. But if I buy a high end gaming computer, I might be mining Monero with it, but I might also be playing Skyrim, or something like it. And they don't know which it is.

Also, to the best of my knowledge, there are at least 15,000 Monero nodes in the network. While I'm not certain how many Bitcoin nodes there are, I do know that that is quite a bit more than some other coins, such as Dogecoin ~700 nodes.