Nostr Web Client

I told you the answer, you simply don't believe me. You've got alot more research to do. Best of luck.

Oh, you’re not busy anymore! Hope you had the time to read the thread with Matt Black.

Correction: you told me your opinion and couldn’t provide any logic or evidence. Everyone can see you didn’t answer anything. Btw, you know that only midwits believe strongly in something they can’t defend, right? Must have been a blow to your ego to discover you had nothing.

I know, I know. The answer is just that Peter Todd, Matt Corallo, everyone is wrong. But why? …And you can’t explain. 🤡😂

It’s funny how you keep responding to me with nothing. I must be living rent free in there.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 1y ago 💬 1

Apologies I can't find time to reply to lazy douchebags who'd rather save face with insults and emojis than do any actual research.

You've been wrong about several points in this discussion and when you're wrong you brush over them and move on to the next goal post.

I've already told you that CTV doesn't cause MEV, out of band payments are no diff than LN payments, and even Peter Todd says "It’s fair to say that CTV has the broadest support among the technical community of any covenant opcode proposal because of its relative simplicity and wide range of use-cases."

Best of luck with more podcast "research" of yours.

techfeudalist 1y ago

Hey, you read Peter’s paper! Nice. You finally figured out that it wasn’t a podcast. 👍

Notice that Peter didn’t say “because it’s risk free”. Or maybe you didn’t? You got distracted on his comment regarding use cases. We weren’t even talking about that. 🤷‍♂️

Ah, you’re busy now. Still waiting for you to explain why Peter is wrong about the risk. I guess I’m going to be here a long time. 😴

PS. Remember, those who feel strongly about something they can’t defend…