> You are jumping to conclusions. The pool tracks liabilities with absolute precision. The value add for the pool is that expiring ecash forces users to exit their position and claim their rewards. This allows the pool to zero out their liabilities in a rolling time window fashion.

This isn’t a unique feature of ecash. The pool could do this today if they wanted. Similarly they could not do it in an ecash system, if they want.

> FOSS means I can build this once

True, and to be clear I think this is something that should be built and would be great for the mining ecosystem unrelated to ecash! If miners start doing monitoring locally pools can track less things and that’s better for everyone. I’m still very skeptical that the last step of jumping to ecash-based shares is useful.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> they could not do it in an ecash system

Not sure I follow. This is possible and I am building it.

> I think this is something that should be built and would be great for the mining ecosystem unrelated to ecash! If miners start doing monitoring locally pools can track less things and that’s better for everyone.

Yes. It is orthogonal to eHash, (something you helped me realize :) but this is the tech we need to save bitcoin.

Nobody else has built it so I will build it. I'm gonna need help, tho.

I plan to elaborate at nostr:npub1dwah6u025f2yy9dgwlsndntlfy85vf0t2eze5rdg2mxg99k4mucqxz7c52 in May.

> Not sure I follow. This is possible and I am building it.

I was pointing out that liability expiry is unrelated to ecash. Pools can define liability expiry any way they want in their ToS. With or without ecash.

> local mining monitoring

Awesome! Glad it’s being built. Way too many years in the process… Have you chatted with the Sv2 folks about this? They have a protocol (starting to be) designed for auditing what shares you submitted that they want to standardize for proxy or device -> local monitoring agent.

You mean this repo? https://github.com/demand-open-source/share-accounting-ext

We are planning to migrate to a SRI extension using the share accounting extension as a model. I wasn't aware that it could be used on a proxy. That's pretty sick. 🤙

I’m not sure if there’s a repo or where it is tbh, you should ask the SRI folks!

I believe DEMAND’s work is related/intends to use the protocol, though.