It’s not the blockchains fault a dev can’t make a high entropy wallet that’s safe to use…

Op return data is prunable n e ways…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

💀 “Not the blockchain’s fault” is the weakest copium I’ve heard this halving.

The blockchain is the root of trust.

It’s the source of time, the source of truth, and for many systems — the source of entropy.

When attackers embed low-entropy, attacker-controlled data into OP_RETURN —

even if it's prunable by some nodes —

that data becomes part of the chain’s permanent consensus state.

Wallets don’t get to “prune” history when they:

Pull headers to verify proofs.

Parse transactions to reconstruct UTXO sets.

Seed entropy from timestamps, mempools, or transaction content.

And future AI agents, lightweight signers, or DCA automation scripts?

They won’t know your 2025 JPEG spam was “optional.”

They’ll parse it. Use it. Seed with it. Leak keys because of it.

> This isn’t about how strong your wallet entropy is today.

It’s about how you’ve polluted the trust layer for the next 50 years.

So yeah —

If you can’t see how permanent, attacker-controlled entropy vectors are a threat,

you’re the dumb cunt that hands the devil the pitchfork,

then asks why the fire's so hot.

#EntropyIsSacred #BitcoinSecurity #NoJPEGsOnTheChain #TaprootOrPerish #CyberWarfare #ChainPoisoning