Ya might wanna go do some independent research into the sun's impact on our weather. Short and long term effects. It's kinda a big deal having that massive ball of fire up there.
The IPCC only recently started paying attention to the solar impacts on climate change and as they incorporate more of what they're learning into their models the facts don't lie. The propaganda over the past 50+ years is falling apart for those that are actually paying attention.
Totally agree. I'm just pointing to things we can change. If we fixed our farming and water usage, we wouldn't need to worry about solar cycles (as much)
Agree on monocrop being fuckery. Also agree that solar is the impact less reviewed, especially as the EM field around earth degrades with magnetic pole shifts.
Big fan of actionable direct things that align more with nature. Like regenerative agriculture.
Whats the water table thing?
Water tables (the depth in the ground at which there's groundwater) around the world have fallen in the past century or so. Its because of two things - over extraction from aquifers, and a reduction in the amount of water being retained in the ground. Less water retained is because we tend to flatten hills, fill in ponds, and redirect flows. Water stabilizes temperatures - this is why coastal places near the equator arent as hot as large land masses at the same latitude. Water can absorb a lot of heat before increasing it's own temperature - this is called 'specific heat capacity.' So what I'm asserting is, lower water tables are making it easier for wider temperature fluctuations in inland or urban areas.
Its not all bad news, though. The higher CO2 is allowing more vegetation to grow in more places, which is great for maintaining water tables. Plants covering the ground allows the ground to retain its moisture for longer - key phrase to google about this is "evapo-transpiration cycle."
If we stopped doing the kind of farming where you run a combine over rows of monoculture, and got better about using ponds to retain runoff, this would fix itself. Water tables would recharge, and increased insolation wouldn't be a worry.
Fixing agriculture and over extraction of water will do nothing to reduce the risk from the sun. The sun is the greatest risk to humanity full stop. Everything else going on is just a distraction manufactured by those that know the truth. Science and history do not lie.
Science and history both lie, with apparently increasing frequency. But I get your point... And partially disagree. Not totally - the sun could overwhelm the earth in a second if it wanted to. But the fact that life exists here is a pretty good indication that long periods of stability are the norm. I've seen videos about how the sun is increasing activity and that's the driver - sure, but the earth is a complex and dynamic system, meaning inputs are not 1:1 with outputs and energy is distributed and moderated. The biggest thing moderating solar heat absorption is water. Humidity, ground water, cloud cover, ice cover, depth of ocean thermocline - all of these moderate heat and interact with each other in unpredictable ways. The only safe conclusion is that water stabilizes temperatures and more water makes for better stabilization. So if we're worried about "climate change" (I'm not really) or milankovich cycles, then the primary question is how much water is in the land. Because we live on land. We definitely should build Seasteads, though.
It's so multifaceted though to the whole. strip mining, clear cutting etc have not been helpful. Poor water management and other issues are all compounding
Human activity is a rounding error comparative to the impact the sun has on Earth. The climate narrative is a distraction and future scapegoat for some seriously bad shit the sun is about to throw at us in order to maintain compliance longer and disguise the truth.
I don't disagree with that overall but we can be better stewards of what we have is my point
