The fact the here has never been a single experiment to prove the motion of the Earth means it is a BELIEF. Relativity was theorised because of the failed Michelson-Morley experiment, in order to continue the ridiculous assertion that the earth is moving, or “we must be wrong”.
One doesn’t need relativity for GPS… what are you talking about?
Then they had to come up with two different types of relativity, selectively applying it where the one or other fails to explain some motion or observation. Then came dark matter and dark energy to continue plugging holes in the theory; things that we cannot observe or measure, but they have to exist in order for this religion not to fall apart. If you have any common sense and don’t see how ridiculous that is, you may be part of what could be defined as a religious cult.
Theoretical physics is going no where because it is based on theories that go against all observations and experiments in order to continue pushing those original beliefs and assumptions. I’m not sure what they’re pushing forward in exactly, perhaps spinning their wheels would be more apt. Seriously, there is nothing impressive about dark matter and energy, it’s why so many physicists are distancing themselves from it.😂
Indeed, these theories fail to explain a lot, and it is a not much more than a biased belief because you entirely dismiss theories which are both kinetamically and dynamically equivalent in validity, if not even more so.
A unifying theory of everything would be the holy grail, but it will never be achieved if they continue to ignore the aether.
I laugh about this because I doubt their theories, and I’m certain they are lying about a lot of things.
Our motion is relative to other objects. Einstien assumed no absolute space, as opposed to Newton, therefore eliminating the concept of absolute motion, in favour of inertial frame of reference.
Our clocks run slower here on the surface of the earth relative to the orbiting GPS satellites, thus if we didn't account for that through General Relativity, then our satellites wouldn't sycronise properly and any measurement of a position would make no sense.
If you have a theory that explains dark matter and energy you're free to give it a crack. There are many physicists that are doing such a thing, questioning some of the base assumptions both Newton and Einstien made, e.g. assuming that space-time is not fundamental, that it is an emergent property of some other phenomenon.
Thread collapsed
Ultimately science is a belief in a way, but slightly different to most other beliefs. One of the pillars of science is induction, which has no justification. Induction happens to align with our natural functioning, so therefore we accept it as true without any reason to believe otherwise, just like axioms of mathematics.
Speaking of which, science is supported by mathematics, which itself has these underlaying axioms which depend on our belief in them. Combine all this with our rules of logical inference, we get the scientific method, all from a set of basic beliefs that any "rational" person would agree on.
Thread collapsed
