every empire falls after 400 years, or at minimum goes into a massive crisis and has to be completely remade... roman empire went through two cycles and then when that ran out they started the roman cacholic church... the US empire now is really UK version 2, and it's due to finish

and what's really interesting is that an extra close alignment of jupiter and saturn, which has a 20 year cycle normally, every 20 cycles it becomes the "bethlehem star" hah and i see that fact checkoors are trying to debunk this

https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/the-great-conjunction-of-jupiter-and-saturn/

not only did this bethlehem star fall in december 2020, it fell right smack on the solstice as well, which is consistent with the "jesus born in december" story and the three wise men thing

about the same time, the roman empire ran its second phase and this ended in ~300s and Constantine pretended to be converted to the christianity that was the choice of everyone in europe who hated rome

british empire really started in 1600 and partly because it became more free and economically powerful due to the breakup of their monarchic system and the start of their democracy due to the Magna Carta, 400 years before in 1200, and then by late 1600 the mayflower sailed and we see rise of the american version of the british empire which is tapped out by 2000 and the next cycle is on the road, and this close conjunction in december once again marks the real end of it and the beginning of the new

it's no coincidence they timed the covid thing for this, they are hoping to pilot the next imperium but they also know that the beginning of this cycle is going to be abruptly disturbed by the earth's magnetic field collapsing (already is less than 50% of 1859 when the Carrington event happened) and we just need an X20 or so and electronic/industrial society is toast for at least a generation

You are so right about Constantine. So much so, that he moved the capital.

1600 is the Dutch golden age. British empire might not have thrived if others didn't pave the way, like USA cannot thrive alone.

I don't know about the other stuff.

What i know is that empires collapse when they cannot stay on the edge by themselves and when submiting others is an unaffordable burden that cause misery inside and havoc outside. That is what Stella miss i think. USA is not a progressive power anymore...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yeah, they have over-extended and their industrial capacity has basically collapsed, the countrty is basically running as a con job on the rest of the world who only have to start recognising this and building their own monetary systems, and look, there's already one to work from!

also i think that her viewpoint is colored by what is a common sentiment of resignation in germany right now... the NATO aligned federal government of germany has been systematically destroying industry and power generation capacity and eroding culture with a flood of migration and the EU has helped out by legislating against most of the agriculture production of the country on top of all the rest

it's not hard to see why they are depressed, they are eating shit food, their government is taxing them higher than ever before and sending even more of that to be burned in ukraine, and doing nothing about the escalating threat of terrorism in their cities

I am sure Stella understands everything. But she is on denial in certain things. But we love her anyway 😀.

One more thing i want to say. I am anti-western. That is as clear as it gets. That does not make me pro russian or whatever...

i also hate the 5 or however many it is eyes too

refuse to go back to australia, lived in UK for so far 18 months of my life and also never want to go back to it

considering going to some of the more free parts of the current USA because of geography but i'm equivocal about taht because i think that balkans and north africa have areas that are also similarly desirable for similar reasons

i think that people in general are in denial because of normalcy bias and they don't want to believe they have rolled the snake eyes and been born during a time of great cataclysm

i'm rolling with it, i don't mean to be late to this bus, because it's gonna be really rough for the idiots that refuse to accept that literally there is times when apocalyptic is the day

Yes i agree. I agree specifically about the balkans and i am living in such an area. But... maybe it is not as good as we would like. Authority's long hand and other hazards can reach this place too...

well, balkans has long been a place of hidden enclaves and citadels, during the time of the Ottomans many monasteries cloistered up on hard to reach positions high in the mountains

i think possibly the pole flip positions tend to be fairly stable over more recent history and that the location has been ideal for retreat during the interglacial periods for at least 24000 years, and the terrain perfect for citadels against imperial power, the most recent history

like, maybe you know of the fact that north africa once was a very very wet place?

maybe that is because, as i strongly now suspect, it was the old equator, cutting through from the baltics down through the balkans through the region between libya and egypt and chad

there is other evidences of this being a former warm place as well during bad times, like the fact that the most ancient discoveries of gold come from the shores of the black sea, which if my model is correct, was formerly a subtropical region

when you start to get used to the idea that the earth may well rotate every 12000 years 90 degrees and that the equator in its alternate phase to the one we are in now cuts around that area... it explains SO MUCH

Well i am aware of this place

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tassili_n%27Ajjer

So for sure northern africa area was much different.

Also there were lions here in the balkans etc. Yes it was different. But, i don't know why...

But maybe you should consider that many more volcanos eere active in the past and that can make a difference, i think...

yeah, you see, my hypothes matches this anomalous observations

and i may offend some christian/jew views about the timeline of the Great Flood by saying it was ~12000 years ago and that Babel was in fact a disaster period spanning about 1000 years and when the genesis says ... what does it say, adam lived 900 years... yeah, more like 4500 probably

Christian/jew stories of the old testament are originated on the views of babylonians sumerians and others. They are not their own. Borrowing stories from others reduces much accuracy.

yeah, the similarity between genesis and much of sumerian stories is not hard to notice

but that's why enoch is so interesting because it appears to be from sources that predate those other stories

the epic of gilgamesh also, seems to be temporally located between babylon and noah so again, more points at this direction

There are several books of enoch. I read them all. Some have really old sources, that's for sure.

The story of Gilgamesh is the first written story. And the fact Utnapistim (Noah) is mentioned, is one of the proofs that christians/jews have borrowed their stories from elsewhere.

yep, "first" haha

not just that they borrowed from elsewhere but there was a before, if you ask me