The worst thing is that it bothers me because by slowing down the blocks or even not relaying them at all, I « censor » perfectly legitimate transactions.
Discussion
There is not censorship in Bitcoin system as long as Bitcoin regular nodes and mining nodes are decentralized. I personally, do not worry about that aspect or narrative.
And if mining node operators process non-inscription transactions, then the entire Bitcoin system works as before; #Ordislow would not be active at all, thus no effects as #Ordislow would never existed.
You don't, censoring would be rejecting a block because it has inscriptions. Though in reality this would only kick you out of the Bitcoin consensus.
The mere fact that you stay in consensus proves that you aren't censoring anything.
I think I chose the term wrong I would say earlier than in the event of a block reorganization, which the desired effect, the transactions that was confirmed are no longer what is still a little annoying for legitimate transactions without being dramatic obviously.
That situation is always possible even without #Ordislow. Participants of the Bitcoin system should know the concept of “confirmation” and evaluate how many confirmations they consider safer.
For instant payments; the choice to use would be lightning.
Unfortunately, people still accept zero-conf transactions 😬