Nos.social is running a communist censorship regime. No it’s not a good option. It’s an anti-free speech bastardization of nostr’s ideals.
nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240 is a legend
nostr:npub1pu3vqm4vzqpxsnhuc684dp2qaq6z69sf65yte4p39spcucv5lzmqswtfch is a good nostr social client option for people if they want
Discussion
That (censoring) is happening at the client level. Personally I have no expectations for all clients to be censorship resistant. All that matters is the protocol is censorship resistant for the all encompassing clients (w/o censorship) to build atop #nostr
Sure, but also we have an obligation to speak out against clients who’s values don’t align with the principles of anti-censorship
I dont know about being obligated, but the right and ability to point it out without being censored is there. #bitcoin and #nostr are for our “enemies” too. Comes with open-source territory.
Maybe I misunderstand, I thought it was user choice. Is it from the company level?
I mean I only actively use damus and primal
Choosing to interact with the bot is a user level interaction. How the bot is written is a decision by rabble.
Still sounds like an opt-in user option to me.
Anyone can use nostr, build on it, and choose to use tools like that even if you or I disagree with it.
I’d have to do more research and look into it, I haven’t yet. But I probably wouldn’t use it or feel the need to. Mute or unfollow is good enough for me for the time being
