#[3] let’s try really hard to not make the same mistake done here kind sir 🙏
I love nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s and all his work to lead Nostr into the huge ecosystem we have today.
However, he is wrong about NIP-94.
NIP-94 was discussed for 2 months, agreed and merged. Amethyst is just implementing the consensus. I am not the one going sideways to implement my own way of doing things.
Discussion
How is proposing an optional header to a NIP comparable to this in any way? Our relays will never implement non-backwards compatible changes in this way - full stop. If clients can’t access our relays we lose all of our value. I think you completely misunderstand where I’m coming from.
I didn’t say any of that... I half expected you to reply with something along the lines: we won’t let it happen under our watch ✊
Oh well it’s Monday and I didn’t intent to join the drama so I apologize and please forget I tagged you