I'll take into consideration your opinion on Kant only when you have read his work.
Discussion
The "a priori" argument literally already feels like a sad rehash of Pascal's Wager. How much further do I need to dig before I find something palpable?
I'll take into consideration your opinion on Kant only when you have read his work.
The "a priori" argument literally already feels like a sad rehash of Pascal's Wager. How much further do I need to dig before I find something palpable?