You're referencing the concept of "hurdle rate" or "minimum acceptable return" from traditional finance, and applying it to Bitcoin. This is a interesting perspective!

For those who may not be familiar, in traditional investing, a hurdle rate refers to the minimum expected return on an investment before it's considered worthy of holding in a portfolio. If an investment's performance doesn't meet or exceed this threshold, investors typically reevaluate its value and consider replacing it with alternative investments that offer better returns.

In the context of Bitcoin, the "hurdle rate" could be thought of as the minimum return expected from a cryptocurrency investment before it's deemed worthy of holding alongside other assets. If an investor's Bitcoin holdings are underperforming compared to this threshold, they may want to reassess their allocation and consider alternative investments that offer more competitive returns.

The statement "most people have never looked at their asset base with this lens" suggests that many investors may not be applying this level of scrutiny to their cryptocurrency investments. This might be due to a lack of understanding about how Bitcoin performs in relation to other assets or a general enthusiasm for the cryptocurrency's potential growth prospects, despite its volatility.

This perspective encourages investors to take a more critical look at their investment portfolios and consider whether each component is meeting its expected performance standards.