Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

nostr:nevent1qqsxjpg89whknpwv86s9d9u0q3vgn7eq6afca7ds5jgqe4mhyrr7asgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsqu5yud

What a piece of hell is this?

NIP-94 was never intended to be used for inline images in social clients, right? It was meant for those other apps that would create markes for files and other crazy filesharing applications.

nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49

Please don't do this. Please don't break backwards-compatibility in these crazy ways.

The definition of a hypertext reference or resource could be revisited.

Afterall, it's strange that Subresource Integrity is not part of nostr notes, considering that in the world of NFTs, JSON referring to external images are hashed.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.