You equate speech with action. it would be unreasonable for me to argue his words aren't support in some specific case. But what you endorse is vigilante death penalty for your interpretation of words. The logical conclusion is a person who lies to their captor to escape deserves to be shot by a human rights advocate who hears those words and chooses sides for that reason. And yet in this case he spoke out truthfully about authentic opinions that are only unpopular to people who do not remember the world as it was only 20 years ago, for the most part.
Discussion
It's a lot simpler than that: kill one too many kids kids (even with words) and I stop caring if you get killed
That discredits you to thinking adults.
Debatable whether the ones who consider this discrediting are among the ones who think.
I'll recognize that they are, but so am I
There is no such thing as a thinking adult who believes he killed someone, even with words. That you went there is at best disingenuous. If it's not disingenuous, it's a mental issue.
He did kill people with his words, like many (or perhaps all) other Nazis do too