nostr:npub1ddpukxz4rkcadch7gu5hqre42lju5spyg2ph747yvgysathy4ulqye2tax nostr:npub1lrvmc88ck63qpt734w85t5pnxchncvam0p9k9mueuezqz0grkn6s8jtth9 The NYT article explains why it appears to be illegal. I posted a free link to it below.
nostr:npub1lrvmc88ck63qpt734w85t5pnxchncvam0p9k9mueuezqz0grkn6s8jtth9 That subpoena power is not worth the cup of coffee sipped as one types out the subpoena.
Still don't see anything that makes the gifts illegal.
Yes, it is corrupt but not in the eyes of the law.
Discussion
nostr:npub1kc36l5aau7kr0f09djqfk3tued9hgzf4855cvvjpd9zv8vy8lztqlumtlk nostr:npub1lrvmc88ck63qpt734w85t5pnxchncvam0p9k9mueuezqz0grkn6s8jtth9
The best I make out that insinuates wrong-doing is the lack of documentation of a loan that exceeds $10k. That non-reporting is against the rules for the court.
Like the other times this was discovered with him and other justices
A rule that has no penalty is...a suggestion.
Or did I miss what you saw as illegal in the article?
It *should* be illegal, but is it?