Stop letting these people confuse you about how Bitcoin operates

You *all of you* innately understand Bitcoin…

You know that the chain HAS to remain immutable or it has ZERO value proposition

Luke cannot hard fork a zkp …. The entire consensus set would HAVE to agree on the fork (or the creates an orphaned chain which a much more appropriate way to explain forks)

If there was mass scale consensus it would then *inherently* be different than a hard fork

Even if you *did do this* this leads to a future where every single tx comes into question…

Meaning that per tx, there would need to be group consensus on which tx gets pruned off over and over again for all of infinity

Meaning, censorship resistance IS dead… once again, that leads to bitcoin having zero value proposition

Nostr users should understand this more than *any other group of individuals* as you experience these split time streams per each client you use (“mempool observation”) versus actually choosing to collectively blacklist a user

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

🤫 let them keep digging

Napoleon had some thoughts about this

It’s hurting my heart to do so lol

I still haven’t seen anything from Luke about wanting to hard fork. This shit doesn’t sound real to me. No actual bitcoiner wants the ability to prune transactions. That’s literally censorship…

Big fan of focusing on "orphaned chain" language instead of "hard fork". Thanks for pointing this out!