Incentivizing repost bots is my concern 🤔
Discussion
Also a thing. This is more complicated than you would think. Looks like you have been thinking about this a bit longer 😅
Tim Apple poured cold water over experimentation on iOS by calling zaps “purchasing digital content”.
Damus Android should allow for experimentation on this frontier.
#MNGA
Bots usually don't get zaps as zaps are a very conscious action, but also: if the bot is useful in terms of curation and surfacing interesting content, wouldn't the bot (its author) deserve it?
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1440x877&blurhash=i76*2a%7EA-Ar%3FRiE0EKEh9%5BI.IpIVR%25oyxHxGxYxaTGXUEKNaj%5Enjr%3FwzwK%3D%7D%250sCniaxR*R*NuNa-WsQsCn%24axRjR%2BS%23S%23&x=1027cb562cd289d8c0593cca03c3e397d46038a7b04a08223867ea820e29ad4e
Is this configured by the user or the reposter? Aren’t zaps splits defined on the note ?
That's the Amethyst zap splits, and yes, they're on the note. But you could make the repost-zap-splits configurable in the client, so I'd be zapper-preference.
Reposts probably shouldn't be shown unless you follow the npub reposting. ie. Not in global
Then repost bots wouldn't be a concern
I only see them when I review 1984 reports
imposter accounts use reposts from the accounts they are impersonating