Replying to Avatar Logan

Gonna be an awesome convo. One angle I think about a lot:

Don DeLillo described the Kennedy assassination as “the seven seconds that broke the back of the American century.”

And he did so because after that Americans lost conviction in capital-T Truth, in a fundamental coherence of the universe. After all if we can’t even determine who committed the most famous murder since Franz Ferdinand, if we have to fall back on “magic bullet” theories, does anything mean anything? Is there something behind the curtain?

This, coupled with Vietnam, creates the perfect backdrop for the intellectual revolution that is postmodernism and all its tributaries and outgrowths.

Postmodernism takes over college campuses. Critical theorists like Derrida and Foucault and de Man become rockstars. Academia becomes almost a competitive game to see who can formulate the most radical understanding of the world.

We go off gold in 1971, and inflation ensues. For the next 50 years everything gets more expensive, especially higher education. So at the same time post-structuralists and post-colonialists et al are saturating the academy, the number of folks who can actually afford to go to the academy is decreasing.

So now we have elite schools increasingly captured by what is essentially an evolved viral (almost Darwinian) Marxism, teaching increasingly wealthy and well-connected kids. This is where we are now. With the country’s most affluent, privileged, educated kids becoming the most politically radical, and it’s all occurring in a way and in places more and more detached from the lived reality of normal people. And these kids of course grow up to take powerful positions in society (because they’re wealthy and well connected).

So a schism between “the Left” and the constituents it purports to care most about, “the working class,” emerges and grows.

Most regular people are basically just like what the actual fuck are you guys talking about.

And so the Left becomes utterly detached from its target demographic and becomes instead like an eternal regress of theoretical nonsense.

Like the bird in an early David Foster Wallace story (the title escapes me at the moment) that flies in increasingly narrower circles until it actually flies up its own ass.

Voila here we are. nostr:note1vysmayhv5xa3hsj42vfs8jt0ze6kzf7vqpqn766yy0yrlk63vjnq8t05lw

A lot to unpack here. I’m responding in part because I don’t wanna loose this note as I come back and think about it a little more.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Curious to hear your thoughts! I don’t think this is the only or exhaustive explanation, of course. But it’s a lens I think about a lot.

College costs continued to rise, and did so in part because of ever increasing direct and indirect government subsidies.

Couple this with 1971, the gutting of the manufacturing base, and the rise of the managerial class, and you have a bloated fiat system of higher education.

Not only were the colleges and universities seeding the American workforce with the new managerial class, but their own hallowed halls as well, with ever growing administrative positions, chairs, and divisions—all without any real function in research or teaching, but a mandate to do something, anything in the realm of policy.

Well-said, my theory definitely does not account for the hollowing out of the manufacturing base which I agree is huge.