Radical Activist Judges: A Threat to the Republic
The United States is a republic where the people’s votes choose leaders to make and enforce laws. In 2024, voters elected a government led by President Donald Trump, demanding tough border security, action on illegal immigration, and the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. But radical activist judges—Joel Cano, Hannah Dugan, James Boasberg, Brian Murphy, Indira Talwani, Paula Xinis, and Nina Wang—are defying the will of the people to push their own political agendas. These judges, many Democrat operatives rife with conflicts of interest, including family members who benefit from or support Democratic causes that profit from the policies they favor, act as unelected tyrants. By blocking voter-backed policies and, in some cases, breaking the law themselves, they erode the republic’s foundation, undermine trust in our courts, and threaten our democratic system.
Defying the People’s Will
The 2024 election was a resounding mandate for strict immigration laws, including deporting undocumented criminals and ending parole programs to execute a historic mass deportation operation. Yet, radical activist judges, acting as Democrat operatives, are blocking these policies, ignoring the electorate and prioritizing their partisan interests over the people’s democratic choice.
Radical Judges Breaking the Law and Facing Arrest
Two radical activist judges, Joel Cano and Hannah Dugan, went beyond blocking policies—they broke the law themselves and have now been arrested for their actions.
Joel Cano (New Mexico)
Former judge Joel Cano resigned on March 3, 2025, after federal agents found an alleged gang member, Cristhian Ortega-Lopez, living at his property. On April 24, 2025, Cano and his wife were arrested for hiding evidence to protect Ortega-Lopez. Cano’s illegal act of harboring a dangerous criminal betrays the people’s demand for action on illegal immigration, showing loyalty to radical Democratic causes over the electorate. His arrest underscores the consequences of such judicial overreach.
Hannah Dugan (Wisconsin)
On April 25, 2025, Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested for helping a previously deported undocumented criminal escape ICE. She snuck them out a private exit, leaving victims and the prosecutor behind. Dugan’s illegal actions put lawbreakers above justice, defying the voters’ call for mass deportations and damaging the republic’s trust in its courts. Her arrest highlights the accountability these radical Democrat operatives now face for breaking the law.
Federal Radical Judges Blocking the People’s Mandate
Several other federal radical activist judges, many Democrat operatives with conflicts of interest tied to family members who support or benefit from Democratic immigration policies, are halting deportations, overriding the will of the people:
James Boasberg (Washington, D.C.): On March 15, 2025, he stopped deportation flights, meddling in the people’s mandate for mass deportations.
Brian Murphy (Boston): He blocked rapid deportations on March 28 and April 18, 2025, stalling voter-backed policies.
Indira Talwani (Boston): On April 10, 2025, she preserved parole for 450,000 migrants, defying the electorate’s demand for tougher immigration measures.
Paula Xinis (Maryland): She challenged deportations over a single error, obstructing the mass deportation operation.
Nina Wang (Colorado): On March 21, 2025, she shielded illegal immigrant Jeanette Vizguerra from deportation.
These radical judges push Democratic agendas, acting as unelected policymakers. Their rulings defy the will of the people who elected a government to execute the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, attacking the republic’s core.
A Direct Threat to the Republic
In our republic, the Constitution gives lawmaking to Congress, enforcement to the President, and interpretation to judges. When radical judges, many Democrat operatives with family ties to Democratic causes, block policies or break the law themselves as Cano and Dugan did, they steal power from the government elected by the people, acting like unaccountable monarchs who crush the electorate’s will.
Overruling Voters
The 2024 election gave a clear mandate for strict immigration laws and a historic mass deportation operation. Radical judges like Boasberg and Dugan nullify this, substituting their Democratic loyalties for the people’s choices. This betrayal destroys faith in the republic, as citizens see their votes ignored by a corrupt judiciary.
Partisan Power Grab
These radical judges, many Democrat operatives rife with conflicts of interest, including family members who benefit from or support Democratic causes that profit from lax immigration policies, align with the Democratic Party’s agenda to obstruct the people’s demand for action on illegal immigration. Public outrage on X calls them “Democrat operatives” for favoring criminals over citizens. This turns courts into partisan weapons, not impartial guardians of the republic.
Undermining the Rule of Law
Radical judges like Cano and Dugan, now arrested for their crimes, violated federal laws by shielding criminals, endangering communities. When courts protect lawbreakers or break the law themselves, they lose legitimacy, threatening the republic’s foundation of justice and order.
The Stakes
Radical activist judges like Joel Cano, Hannah Dugan, James Boasberg, Brian Murphy, Indira Talwani, Paula Xinis, and Nina Wang are a direct threat to the republic. Cano and Dugan, now arrested for breaking the law, exemplify the danger of Democrat operatives with conflicts of interest who prioritize partisan agendas over justice. By blocking deportations and, in some cases, engaging in criminal acts, these radical judges defy the will of the people who elected a government to address illegal immigration and execute the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Their actions erode trust in our courts and destabilize the democratic system that defines our nation. The republic cannot survive if radical Democrat operative judges keep overriding the people.