sharia forbids treaties leaving muslim land to non muslim countries. none of it. All of Israel was ottoman ==> all peace stuff was always theater, at least w.r.t. permanent peace. It will never stop.

Egypt was able to sign a peace treaty only after Israel returned the Sinai and Egypt renounced Gaza: then, Egypt got all the lands it is responsible for, and left the unsolvable problem for the PLA - now Palestine government is responsible, unable to sign permament peace if Israel exist. Without a khalifa, no muslim government is responsible for the whole world, then there is this loophole. And even then, Sadat was murdered for that.

doubt -> the globalists let the jews go there in the 40's because:

a) they cared about the jews or at least needed a way to get them somewhere out of sight.

b) they did not know sharia and hoped stuff would settle somehow

c) they knew but salivated with the prospect of lucrative endless wars and political divide & conquer: suffering of jews and/or arabs was of no concern.

d) they knew, but better having those jews fighting and absorbing the energy of the muslim world, than having more jihad elsewhere. better them than us. if they want to go into the fire, who are we to say no?

these options are not exclusive if you consider different actors may know and want different things