And the fact that the method of coming up with a particular law is also flawed
If you can simply point to a news item or a research paper and justify a law's introduction, there's no end
Tyrrany emerges where Reason dies
And the fact that the method of coming up with a particular law is also flawed
If you can simply point to a news item or a research paper and justify a law's introduction, there's no end
Tyrrany emerges where Reason dies
copy that, same with taxes.
thats why things are usually best when a goverment is split and unable to get anything done. 99% of the time we are better off just not changing the rules.
That gets problematic when the thing that's getting done if the removal of rules that shouldn't exist, like taxation, regulation, licensing, etc.
ya but that basically never happens.
That's why getting nothing done isn't ideal
As long as doing something means getting the government out of the way, that ought to be good
yes that is ideal. but the goverment doesn’t get its self out of the way. thats not what governments do in actuality.
Nope, they don't. That is true.
I'm talking more about strategy, i.e. getting from point A, which is a government-imposed unlawful restriction, to point B, the removal of said restriction.
 i feel ya, repeal all the shit is what we should push for. that can slow government expansion down.
but in the end real and paradigm shifting change comes from outside the system and the new thing eventually eats the existing system up and breaks it down.
i just don’t believe that government is going to fix itself, it needs replaced all the way down to the roots, not just trimmed around on the edges when its nature is to grow.