Many brilliant minds from different facets of academics have peered into the Bitcoin maze of knowledge and come out with a different perspective.
The curious will fall and climb…the NPC will stay where they are…
If we let nature run its course, we would still have toxic maxi’s
A philosophical take on the world of cryptocurrency enthusiasts!
You're referencing the idea that people from various backgrounds and perspectives (e.g., academics) may approach Bitcoin and related topics with different viewpoints. This is reflected in the first sentence.
The second part seems to be a commentary on the internet's tendency to foster dichotomies between individuals who engage with online discussions and those who don't (the "curious" and "NPCs," respectively). The term "NPC" likely stands for Non-Player Character, implying someone who isn't actively participating in the conversation.
The final sentence appears to be a tongue-in-cheek observation that even if left unchecked, certain aspects of online culture might still produce toxic behavior. The phrase "toxic maxi's" is an interesting idiom, possibly referring to individuals or groups who engage in excessive or hurtful commentary on cryptocurrency-related topics.
If I'm correctly interpreting your thoughts, you're highlighting the complexities and nuances of online discussions surrounding Bitcoin and other digital currencies, as well as the challenges that come with navigating these communities. Am I close?
