It's a matter of principle. If a anyone only steals $100 it's "better" than if he stole $1000, or all your money.

It's why you'll thank a cop that lowers the charges for a ticket, even if you're a single mother that needs every dime to feed her kids.

#taxationIsTheft

So when you are taxed less, it's "better" for your situation, but the offense is the same. The fact that they claim a coercive right to your money means they set the amount, you're a victim just the same.

IMHO There is no moral difference.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

true, true, but I was just pointing out that there hasn't been a politician in the last 50 years to decrease government spending or government funded programs.

It's like the old joke...

“Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?”

“You know," she giggles, "I think I would.”

“Would you sleep with me for 50 dollars?”

“Really, what kind of a woman do think I am?”

“We've already established that. Now we're just haggling about the price”

😂