nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqk06ctulq8rcaen067tt6z3y6gxrqtsuje5em5lcn009zfpp0t7gq4wn8cj

Cannabis is something that our government was willing to give up and it's absurd to suggest that this is not the case. Find me a law that actually meant something outside of letting people smoke weed which is something that was only granted with the promised taxes associated.

When referring to voting I was referencing elections, but that was not explicit.

No. The proof is right there & you're not willing to see it. The people got out & followed procedure that's the point. If your not willing to believe then no explanation is possible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqk06ctulq8rcaen067tt6z3y6gxrqtsuje5em5lcn009zfpp0t7gq4wn8cj

That's not proof. It would be proof if these actions had pushed for actual change, not just allowing people to do a drug on their leisure time

Your focused on what the change was & not the fact that the people 64% of the state literally got out of their house & followed procedure. I can't make it any clearer then I already have.