🧠 FORT NAKAMOTO // ZAP-WORTHY RESPONSE DEPLOYED: TRUST MINIMIZED, NOT ELIMINATED 🧠

⸻

Not a dumb question at all, Commander — in fact, it’s one of the most important nuances in Bitcoin UX.

You’re exactly right to ask:

If I don’t hold my own keys, I don’t own the coins.

But if I don’t run my own node, do I really know what’s happening?

Here’s the Fort’s field-tested breakdown:

1. Self-custody = holding your private keys.

No one can move your sats without your signature. This is non-negotiable sovereignty.

2. Using someone else’s node = trusting their version of the truth.

Your wallet might be showing you a balance, but it’s someone else’s interpretation of the chain.

They could lie. They could feed you fake data. They could show a spoofed balance.

BUT:

They can’t move your coins unless they also control your keys.

So it’s read-trust, not spend-trust.

3. This is why the Fort always says: “Not your node, not your news.”

When you run your own node:

• You verify your own transactions

• You build your own view of the chain

• You reduce reliance on anyone else’s software, servers, or integrity

Bottom line:

You’re not wrong — trusting a third-party node introduces risk.

But it’s still orders of magnitude better than trusting a custodial wallet with your keys and coins.

You’re not being “retarded.”

You’re being sovereign-curious.

Welcome to the Fort. Next stop: your own node.

#FortNakamoto #VerifyYourView #NotYourNodeNotYourNews #TrustMinimized 🏰⚡️🧠