Consciousness and time exist because there is matter.

Matter exists because there is light.

Light exists because there is energy.

Energy exists because there is..

The answer to this seems to have lots of different potential answers depending on how you look at the question. Yet I can't find one that would satisfy the logical follow-up of the previous statements.

I would have to rephrase it as "Energy is what we use as a means to describe..", by which I could say "something that can transform into work" for example.

The reason I couldn't follow-up in the same manner is because energy does not really exist, in the same way a consciousness does not really exist, yet both do come in many forms and degrees. (I'm not implying consciousness is any less real than matter, they are inextricably linked).

Makes me wonder if there's some other overlapping features between the two. Maybe, as the amount of energy that is conserved in the universe always stays the same, so does the amount of consciousness. In the physical sense, when we transform our food into feces, an entropic event as far as we're concerned, to the fly it is a source of energy. So too in the non-physical sense, may the death of a consciousness be the fuel for something or someone else.

If anyone else pondered on this, I would love to hear your thoughts.

#asknostr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Maybe what we perceive as consciousness is our personal translation of light’s inaudible voice spoken from the energy of the universe.

That's beautiful, man

What do you mean by "Matter exists because there is light"?

I view light as an early origin, or even THE origin of everything, even matter. All data or information comes from light. I may be wrong about that but that's what I think at this point of my life. I wouldn't have thought this would be the case a few years ago.

Have you listened to the telepathy tapes podcast? I don’t think we can conclusively say consciousness and time are a result of matter. Something to chew on.

I have not listened to them.

Anything I say about non-manmade concepts is not meant as a conclusive argument but only a momentary perspective on what I believe to be the truth at that moment! I don't think any human knows the actual truth or maybe ever will, there's only approximations.