“So — all of Trump's picks to lead our nation's health agencies have either spread anti-vaccine disinformation, opposed lifesaving public health measures during the pandemic, or promoted false health claims and unproven products.”

“So — all of Trump's picks to lead our nation's health agencies have either spread anti-vaccine disinformation, opposed lifesaving public health measures during the pandemic, or promoted false health claims and unproven products.”

Considering the manner in which trials are carried out without placebo control which is fundamentally fraud, would it not be good to have open debate on what truly is disinfirmation in thus space? Surely a retroactive study of vaxxed vs unvaxxed isn't too hard and is much cheaper than the billions for some pretty crap research out there. I think would be nice to know risks and benefits and having read a couple thousand research papers and getting to stage where just bored of blatant statistical fraud, regardless of peoples unscientific views (that's 100℅ of people without better studies being carried out), we could all do with some uncorrupted transparency.