Replying to nobody

I mean name dropping from colleagues really isn’t shilling just because I hear something doesn’t mean I buy it or even care to look at it. Id reference this to someone asking which model is your phone. To each their own as long as he’s going to keep btc as a commodity I could care less but a security will always be a security because of the test not because it’s name dropped or even when time of said name drop occurs or who’s mouth it falls out of. Are people going after cubes for voyager as hard I don’t think so.
Avatar
QW 2y ago

I dunno… I heard him say it’s a “great” technology. I want to buy it now…

May need to investigate that under the Securities Act of 1933.

Kim Kardashian had legal action last year from the SEC. And she had no idea what product she was shilling. Gary’s position on multiple occasions discussing Algorand sure seemed more credible.

I want in. 🤪

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

24
nobody 2y ago

That’s because she didn’t disclose she was paid to endorse it. If he wasn’t paid by Al got and technologically this falls under freedom of speech and free expression to say said name. That’s just me though I won’t speculate too much on old videos and old nonsense. I’m not a sheep I do my own research lol

Avatar
QW 2y ago

Whole point is it’s all ridiculous.

Clarity would fix all.

24
nobody 2y ago

I think we have entered the grey area indefinitely and now we are at a crux lmao cause wtf time and technology have caught up to one another time to create frame works or regulate.

Avatar
QW 2y ago

Governments love the grey area that’s for sure.

24
nobody 2y ago

Now you got me thinking lol I wonder how ppl feel about him doing the blockchain course at MIT then becoming chairman of the SEC. Is he gatekeeping BTC to the outsider looking in or does it give him more clarity to decide what a security is when concerning blockchains and DLT. Hmmmmmm