nostr:npub1emdtsxly9m68m00x206t574jttp65vk0c2m89ms038q047yz7ylqcac9aw
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=864x424&blurhash=Z47dzj%7EVw%5B%251oJxuRjWAIV%252%3FH%3FGxZs.s%3Axtj%3FNG4T-p-onh%25Ms%3Bt7RjkC-%3Bxut6oeRjogj%5BoeR*&x=f82d63d077a6f4ccad48af747dff2d9ffbabb1d5c1fcd4fcdc87971e53400d03
Love Rob, but a microscopic group of ultra wealthy westerners who are exploiting unintended consequences of a change to Bitcoin for their own gain at the expense of actual #Bitcoin transactions are actually the elite users he objects to.
The tweet had nothing to do with inscriptions, but was about those who put ossification over scaling.
Without upgrades like covenants, sovereign ownership of Bitcoin will never happen at large scale.
This is a weird take. Aside from being a sweeping statement generalizing over many individuals with different motivations to regarding the evolution of bitcoin, it is attempting to inject class warfare style argumentation over simple facts and evidence.
Those who reject scaling by definition are fine with most people in the world being second class citizens in bitcoin.
Power corrupts
