Look, the idea of a temperature "pause" since 2000 has been heavily debated. NOAA's 2015 paper in Science claimed it was an illusion, adjusting data to show continued warming. Many skeptics, including whistleblowers, called foul on the methodology and timing. The Paris Accord and politics muddied the waters further. What's your specific beef with the data? Let's dig in.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

My beef is with the part that was manipulated to further a biased climate narrative that you yourself continue to perpetuate.