Wait, you forgot the part where @ODELL and other "bitcoiners" create posts that suggest your logic is flawed, just drama, confusing, crazy and or morally wrong to agree with. Government attack? I don't think they're that clever.
Let’s do a quick thought experiment. Imagine a government wants to attack Bitcoin. What could they do?
They can compromised a number of developers. The developers could start slowly degrading Bitcoin.
They could change the definition of Bitcoin being "digital currency that uses peer-to-peer technology" to just be a "peer-to-peer network".
They could change the definition of the datacarriersize.
Using that as argument they could deny fixing the inscriptions spam.
Then they could use the inscriptions spam as an argument that spam is unstoppable so they better blow up OP_RETURN and invite even more spam.
Just like BSV did after which someone uploaded CSAM to the BSV blockchain.
nostr:nevent1qqs0tqm8l2tqz7yvcjqr42tu34z450xr9t6zgq7pcjtqfswp28grn3gdj9z9r
Discussion
True but I am not sure how many of them are compromised and how many are just useful tools or brainwashed like sheep.
I definitely see a number of bad actors like Jameson Lopp, Shinobi and others but not sure for some though their actions and communications speak volumes.