Replying to Avatar James A Lewis

Sounds cool, but Bitcoin doesn't actually have any zk-rollups yet. That link says that two Eth/altcoin projects want to offer their solution to Bitcoin too.

Sovereign SDK: "As mentioned previously, Chainway’s DA adapter aims to make it easier to connect applications built with the Sovereign SDK to Bitcoin. In other words, the adapter lets Sovereign rollups leverage Bitcoin as their DA layer, something that wasn’t possible before."

Starknet: "Now, Kasar Labs and Taproot Wizards have launched a DA adapter for Bitcoin that seeks to allow developers to anchor rollups built with an open source version of Starknet to the original and most secure cryptocurrency network."

Cool, I'm all for competition so we can find the best solution, but this is no reason to oppose BitVM. Additionally, I would personally prefer a Bitcoin native solution, not a solution 'adapted' to Bitcoin.

Avatar
OceanSlim 2y ago

I don't oppose bitvm entirely. I'm very wary of it's actual utility. Same with the other proposed solutions. A free market of ideas will find the best solution either way. For this, I'm eternally grateful and not too worried for the inevitability.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.