I haven't kept up with him in the past couple of years, so all I would have to go on is this latest "debate" video where doesn't say yes or no to the question.

Last I knew, he'd come pretty close to an actual conversion to Christianity, I think, especially in some of his conversations with Jonathan Pageau. But since I've been following him (since before he was fired from his professorship) he's been a sort of "appreciative agnostic" -- saying things like Jung did: ~ 'it may or may not be true but look at the alternatives, we should all live "as if" it is true.'

All that said, an agnostic is a functional anti-theist. I say that because the God who actually does exist actually has revealed himself in a way that we actually CAN know. The agnostic says that either that God does not exist or that, if he does, he has not revealed himself and therefore we CANNOT know. That latter point is a denial of the actual God-who-is.